Re: [squid-users] transparent proxy with authentication

From: Chin Kah Yi <kahyi@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:39:17 +0800

BlueCoat confirmed they can do transparent proxy with authentication
(http://www.bluecoat.com/downloads/support/BCS_tb_transauth.pdf). I have
downloaded the doc, if you want it, I can email u the doc.

If so, does squid work on that aspect as described by bluecoat in above doc?

-------- Original Message --------
From: Chin Kah Yi <kahyi@kkipc.com>
To: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org>, squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re:[squid-users] transparent proxy with authentication
Date: 28/10/2005 08:39

> I see. but if it is transparent proxy via wccp, how would the IP based
> access control scheme work on bluecoat as bluecoat wouldn't be inline
> to do access control and depending on cisco router?
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org>
> To: Chin Kah Yi <kahyi@kkipc.com>
> CC: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org>, squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re:[squid-users] transparent proxy with authentication
> Date: 28/10/2005 00:57
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Chin Kah Yi wrote:
>>
>>> If wccp with authentication does not work because of wccp design,
>>> Bluecoat claimed their proxy supports wccp with authentication. I
>>> wonder how theirs work?
>>
>>
>>
>> It doesn't actually.
>>
>> They do what you can do, implement a IP based access control sheme
>> using forms based login to the proxy registering your username as the
>> user on the client IP address.
>>
>> Regards
>> Henrik
>>
>
>
Received on Thu Oct 27 2005 - 23:39:26 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Nov 01 2005 - 12:00:05 MST