Re: [squid-users] throughput limitation from cache

From: Jason Healy <jhealy+squid@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:57:39 -0500 (EST)

At 1137150799s since epoch (01/13/06 00:13:19 -0500 UTC), Richard Mittendorfer wrote:
> Also sprach Jason Healy <jhealy+squid@logn.net> (Thu, 12 Jan 2006
> 22:37:58 -0500 (EST)):
> > What are you using for your speed tests? I'm using wget, so I know
> > there's no browser cache issue.
>
> Originally I do a apt-get (it prints the downloadspeed), certainly wget
> gives me same results.
>
> 100Mb/s FD switched Ethernet too. With quite good performance
> NFS(~9.5MB/s) or FTP.

Running out of ideas here...

Have you verified in your cache logs (access.log) that the files you're
downloading are cache HITs? Most of the Debian mirrors I've used
don't do much better than ~250KB/s if they're busy. If for some
reason you weren't loading a cached version, you might just be seeing
the max download speed from the mirror.

Jason

-- 
Jason Healy
http://www.logn.net/
Received on Fri Jan 13 2006 - 06:57:40 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 12:00:01 MST