Re: [squid-users] throughput limitation from cache

On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Richard Mittendorfer wrote:

>> Why I ask is because diskd is known to be somewhat slow on large cache
>
> Not really large. 2x 1G. It's no storage bottleneck I believe.

large cache hits == hits on largeish cached objects.

>> hits in certain situations UNLESS there is sufficient traffic to keep
>> Squid reasonably buzy (i.e. problems if you are the only user, or very
>> few users). And the same for aufs in older versions of Squid.
>
> See. Would fit.

A quick test if this is your problem is to reconfigure your Squid to use
the ufs cache_dir type.

Regards
Henrik
Received on Sat Jan 14 2006 - 06:26:24 MST