Re: [squid-users] acl and cache

From: Aurélien Bras <aurelien.bras@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 12:42:49 +0200

2006/5/3, Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>:
> ons 2006-05-03 klockan 11:37 +0200 skrev Aurélien Bras:
>
> > My object is STALE, the refresh should be good and make a HIT, but
> > BACK make un MISS, is mean that the object is dowloaded another time,
> > am I wrong ?
>
> Was it a TCP_REFRESH_ or a CLIENT_REFRESH_?
>
TCP_REFRESH_ mean my object is STALE and Squid need to verify on
public serveur. HIT mean the object is still good and MISS it isn't.
So, with a miss i need to dowload the file.

With no_cache deny BACK :
TCP_REFRESH_HIT/200 1544 GET <url>.gif - FIRST_UP_PARENT/127.0.0.1 text/html
TCP_MISS/304 232 GET <url>.gif - DIRECT/216.239.59.103 text/html

Without no_cache deny BACK :

TCP_REFRESH_HIT/200 1544 GET <url>.gif - FIRST_UP_PARENT/127.0.0.1 text/html
TCP_REFRESH_HIT/304 232 GET <url>.gif - DIRECT/216.239.59.103 text/html

All my query HIT is REFRESH_HIT, so I want to know if the "no_cache
deny BACK" force Squid to download another time all REFRESH_HIT or
not.

Thanks

Aurélien.

> If in doubt send access.log details with log_mime_hrds on from both
> squids.
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQBEWHpCB5pTNio2V7IRAiChAJoC3w4ZQiCNGuRFmPcu12ByUgy2wACggQmL
> fhbBIRQ2oao89iXuDqNfQ1g=
> =iJ+E
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
Received on Wed May 03 2006 - 04:42:57 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 12:00:01 MDT