[squid-users] Re: SARG

From: nima sadeghian <sadegian@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 08:32:19 +0330

the cpu is 3.0 and free hard space is about 100GB. very strange. I
used it in GNOME. could graphical interface effect the proficiancy?
thnx
nima

On 5/31/06, Shoebottom, Bryan <BShoebottom@fanshawec.ca> wrote:
> I agree, with ~5000 users we process a 1.5GB file nightly and it only
> takes about 30minutes. The system is a dual 3.6GHz.
>
> Thanks,
> Bryan
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Gauthier [mailto:jgauthier@lastar.com]
> Sent: May 31, 2006 9:12 AM
> To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Subject: RE: [squid-users] SARG
>
> > Hi friends
> > my SARG is too slow. I run squid for 400 users here, and a
> > log file about 200MB. after one night SARG is runnig and
> > donot want to give me report . is this ok?
> > How can I change it more quick?
>
> After 1 month my access.log is 1G in size. It only takes a little while.
> This may be disk or CPU based issues. But I would check with the SARG
> lists/maintainers.
>

-- 
Best Regards
NIMA SADEGHIAN
Received on Wed May 31 2006 - 23:02:21 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 12:00:02 MDT