Re: [squid-users] Performance worse when handling IMS requests?

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 21:20:47 +0200

tor 2006-06-15 klockan 12:03 -0400 skrev lawrence wang:

> I would think that 304 responses are easier to serve, since Squid just
> returns headers -- but i can't find any other difference right now.
> Thanks in advance for your help!

It depends.. serving a 304 requires having the object cached in which
case it's ligter than a 200 cache hit. But if it not it's not in the
cache then the request is a cache miss, and the server response can not
be cached (there is no cache object to attach the new freshness info
to).

Regards
Henrik

Received on Thu Jun 15 2006 - 13:20:52 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 12:00:01 MDT