Re: [squid-users] Squid 2/3 slower than direct access

From: nima sadeghian <sadegian@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 00:32:29 -0700

Just go to find problems in ur dns settings, in squid. is ur icp or
isp uses transparent cache upstream. however dns. I have 2 of dl380 ;)
. in unix base systems do not go for cpu and hdd configuration for
squid issues ...
nima

On 9/2/06, Michael Loftis <mloftis@wgops.com> wrote:
>
>
> --On September 2, 2006 7:53:59 PM +1000 Greg Wilson
> <gwilson@summerland.com.au> wrote:
>
> > I've installed Squid on a HP DL380 server with dual cpus, 2 Gb RAM and
> > SCSI raid 5. It's running on Debian Sarge with little extra load. I am
>
> Well...it shouldn't have much to do with the speed of Squid if it's a
> hardware RAID....but has the RAID 5 set finished building? Also are there
> no failed disks in the set?
>
> > using this for our staff of around 100 and though this would do the job
> > easily. It's running with all default Squid settings except Cache RAM
> > which I've increased to 96Mb. There are no peer caches. I have checked
> > that there are no speed and duplex setting mismatches between the proxy
> > and firewall.
> > The squid proxy returns web pages approx. 2/3 slower than a direct
> > connection using the same link.
> > Can some-one please give me some simple steps to increase the speed of
> > the cache?
> > Thanks for any advice.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> "Genius might be described as a supreme capacity for getting its possessors
> into trouble of all kinds."
> -- Samuel Butler
>

-- 
Best Regards
NIMA SADEGHIAN
Received on Sun Sep 03 2006 - 01:32:31 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 12:00:03 MDT