Re: [squid-users] aufs vs diskd

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 20:42:21 +0200

tis 2006-09-12 klockan 17:16 +0300 skrev Anton Glinkov:

> when using aufs the store rebuilding is done MUCH faster compared to
> diskd. But when using diskd, once the store is rebuilt the load average is
> always lower than 1. With aufs it is usually above 2.

And? It's quite natural given what "load average" represents (number of
processes/threads in RUN or IOWAIT state).. For your own sanity it's
best to ignore that metric as it's rarely of any use.

> The CPU time is done mostly by iowait.

Good. What aufs is there for absorbing.

> So which one should i use?

aufs.

Regards
Henrik

Received on Tue Sep 12 2006 - 12:42:26 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 12:00:03 MDT