Re: [squid-users] WCCP on Squid 2.6 (URGENT)

From: Sean <sean.barmettler@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 02:12:58 -1000

3560's operate the same, and 3750's are essentially just 3550's with
stacking, so they'd all be the same.

On 12/3/06, Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2006, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> > You'll want to use the mask assignment method over the default hash
> > method - the mask assignment method will allow a lot more traffic to
> > be redirected in hardware rather than being punted to the MSFC for
> > classification. All the classification is done in hardware rather than
> > bugging the MSFC for all/part of it.
> >
> > wccp2_assignment_method 2
>
> What I should've added there is to use the mask assignment for the
> switching-based Cisco kit - so 6500 and 7600 at the very least;
> maybe later revisions of the 4500 speak it now. Cisco 3550 switches
> speak L2 redirection but not mask assignment. No concrete idea on
> the 3560/3750 switches but I suspect they'll use hash assignment
> for now rather than mask assignment.
>
>
>
>
> Adrian
>
> --
> - Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - Hosting and Commercial Squid Support -
>
Received on Sun Dec 03 2006 - 05:13:03 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Mon Jan 01 2007 - 12:00:01 MST