Re: [squid-users] No nameserver and Forward loop detected.

From: Suhaib Ahmad <suhaib.bms@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:53:21 +0500

thanks a ton Henrik this really clears out many things. I was banging
my head for a while with this problem. Could not find the ans. on the
web. Really appreciate it.

Regards,
Suhaib.

On 6/7/07, Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net> wrote:
> tor 2007-06-07 klockan 20:37 +0500 skrev Suhaib Ahmad:
> > Thanks Henrik, but without mentioning
> >
> > http_port 80 accel defaultsite=your.main.website
> >
> > it was working with paras
> > http_port 80 transparent
>
> transparent is almost equal to accel vhost, but not entirely. The
> differences are
> - transparent supports transparent interception
> - accel requires the use of a cache_peer to forward the request.
> - transparent knows it's supposed to act as a proxy and not authorized
> by the web server, therefore HTTP authentication to Squid is not allowed
> to make sure the proxy admin don't unintentionally crash the HTTP
> protocol.
>
>
> If you are a reverse proxy you SHOULD NOT use transparent, instead use
> the accelerator options (vhost, defaultsite etc..).
>
> If you are a intercepting forward Internet proxy then you SHOULD use
> transparent.
>
> > And any idea why the WARNING: Forwarding loop detected for:. Is this
> > anything todo with dns settings.
>
> It's because your Squid thinks it is an Internet proxy and not a reverse
> proxy, and therefore tries to go direct when it doesn't look like there
> would be any benefit of forwarding the request via other cache peers..
> and when going direct DNS tells it to talk to itself..
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
>
Received on Thu Jun 07 2007 - 10:53:54 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 12:00:04 MDT