Re: [squid-users] aufs versus 2.6-S13 + diskd is freaky bugged

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:42:56 +0200

sön 2007-06-24 klockan 19:36 -0300 skrev Michel Santos:

> swap.state.new stays there but without increasing size anymore

Very very odd.

Hmm.. one idea. Is it possible there was a "squid -k rotate" or "squid
-k reconfigure" call while the rebuild was in progress?

Regards
Henrik

application/pgp-signature attachment: Detta �r en digitalt signerad meddelandedel

Received on Sun Jun 24 2007 - 16:43:01 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Michel Santos: "Re: [squid-users] aufs versus 2.6-S13 + diskd is freaky bugged"
Previous message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: [squid-users] Re: aufs is broken too in 2.6 (and badly)"
In reply to: Michel Santos: "Re: [squid-users] aufs versus 2.6-S13 + diskd is freaky bugged"
Next in thread: Michel Santos: "Re: [squid-users] aufs versus 2.6-S13 + diskd is freaky bugged"
Reply: Michel Santos: "Re: [squid-users] aufs versus 2.6-S13 + diskd is freaky bugged"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 12:00:04 MDT