[squid-users] Re: poor performance

From: RW <fbsd06@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 17:03:15 +0100

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:26:20 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@fantomas.sk> wrote:

> > On 30-Aug-07 My Secret NSA Wiretap Overheard Lutieri G. Saying :
> > > /dev/da0s1a on / (ufs, local)
> > > devfs on /dev (devfs, local)
> > > /dev/da0s1e on /tmp (ufs, local, soft-updates)
> > > /dev/da0s1f on /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates)
> > > /dev/da0s1d on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates)
> > > /dev/da0s2a on /cache (ufs, local, soft-updates)
> > > devfs on /var/chroot/named/dev (devfs, local)
>
> On 30.08.07 12:20, Nicole wrote:
> > I am curious why you opted for a seperate slice for the /cache?
> > I found that to be slower than just having a seperate partition, as
> > odd as that seems.
>
> pardon, he has separate _partition_ - 1 and 2 are partitions, a to f
> are slices.

No, it's the other way round. FreeBSD uses the term partition for its
own native partitions. The slice is the non-native partition into
which they fit.
Received on Mon Sep 03 2007 - 10:03:53 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Mon Oct 01 2007 - 12:00:02 MDT