Re: [squid-users] client_http.hit_median_svc_time: what's the definition, again ?

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:17:32 +1100

Interesting. What happens with requests that contain bodies? I.e., is
#2 really the end of the request, or the request headers?

On 26/01/2008, at 11:23 AM, Chris Robertson wrote:

> john allspaw wrote:
>> Hello smart and nice folks:
>>
>> We have some reverse-proxy caches on the west coast that get hit
>> quite a bit from across the Pacific, and we
>> see cache hit times much higher there than in our other
>> datacenters. I *think* it's because client_http.hit_median_svc_time
>> might also include transfer time to client ? So to confirm:
>>
>> 1. first byte of request into squid
>> 2. last byte of request into squid
>> 3. squid looks to see if ACLs are ok with servicing the request,
>> probably some DNS going on here
>> 4. (squid finds that it's a HIT of some kind)
>> 5. first byte of response to client
>> 6. last byte of response to client
>>
>> does "client_http.hit_median_svc_time" mean the time from #2 thru
>> #6 ?
>>
>
> Yes. http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-users/200606/0351.html
>
>> If it does, then these 'hit' times make sense. if it doesn't, well
>> then I'm confuzzed. :)
>>
>> thanks guys,
>> John Allspaw
>>
>
> Chris

--
Mark Nottingham       mnot@yahoo-inc.com
Received on Mon Jan 28 2008 - 17:17:49 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Fri Feb 01 2008 - 12:00:05 MST