Re: [squid-users] Streaming audio header info

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:13:11 +1300

squid@penguinclub.org.uk wrote:
> This might sound a bit vague, as I have just picked up support for
> squid.
>
> We are currently running squid-2.5.STABLE1 on a Solaris 5.5.1, with
> local password authentication. I am in the processes of replacing it
> with a Solaris 9 box running squid-2.6.STABLE18, and ntlm authenticating
> via samba off our DCs.
>
> Everything seems to work fine off the new scenario, except for a couple
> of users who use winamp to listen to online music etc. On the old set
> up, when they listen to a site, they get the track or station info back
> within winamp. Presumably some form of metadata in the header
> somewhere. But on the new one, that info isn't present - all they see
> is the url they are playing. Otherwise, it all works.
>
> I can't for the life of me work out where this info is being lost. The
> only difference in the log files I see is:
>
> old working proxy:
> 1205225734.572 27711 <ip address> TCP_MISS/600 639404 GET
> http://mp3-vr-128.smgradio.com/ <username> DIRECT/85.159.184.42 -
> 1205226002.900 26061 <ip address> TCP_MISS/600 582218 GET
> http://mp3-vr-128.smgradio.com/ <username> DIRECT/85.159.184.42 -
>
> new failing proxy:
> 1204908920.018 235 <ip address> TCP_MISS/200 7427 GET
> http://mp3-vr-128.smgradio.com/ <username> DIRECT/85.159.184.42 -
> 1204908920.178 224 <ip address> TCP_MISS/200 8719 GET
> http://mp3-vr-128.smgradio.com/ <username> DIRECT/85.159.184.42 -
>
> Is the TCP_MISS/600 vs TCP_MISS/200 significant?
>
> It's not really a show stopper, more of an annoyance, but I'm more
> worried that the problem might manifest itself elsewhere if I have
> something misconfigured.
>
> This is not my area of expertise, and I'm a bit stumped as where to look
> next......
>
> Alan
>

Quite probably it is that 600. HTTP does not define any codes higher
than 599, but that may not stop some server creating its own ones to do
weird stuff.

Can you get a tcpdump/wireshark trace of the headers from the server to
squid. That should give us some idea of what squid trying to cope with.

Amos

-- 
Please use Squid 2.6STABLE17+ or 3.0STABLE1+
There are serious security advisories out on all earlier releases.
Received on Mon Mar 17 2008 - 07:12:21 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 13:00:05 MDT