Re: [squid-users] Caching of directory objects, UDP_MISS

On ons, 2008-05-21 at 14:03 -0600, Dan Trainor wrote:
> It would make sense as to why Squid would be handing out a UDP_MISS for
> that, since it would also make sense that Squid has no desire to cache
> directories

Squid does not make a distinction between a directory and a page or
another HTTP objects. It's all HTTP objects.

But on most servers directory listings is dynamically generated and by
default not cacheable.

However. directories with an index page quite often is cachable. For
example http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.0/

Regards
Henrik