Re: [squid-users] how safe is server_http11?

On tor, 2008-07-03 at 16:55 -0400, Chris Woodfield wrote:
> So we're looking to upgrade from 2.6 to 2.7, primarily to get the HTTP/
> 1.1 header support. I realize that the full 1.1 spec is not completely
> implemented, but are there any real "Danger, Will Robinson!"
> implications?

server_http11 is pretty safe to enable. Actually all of the http/1.1
stuff is quite safe to enable, but server_http11 more than the other.

> Specifically, is there any functionality or access to content that
> would be actively broken because squid is advertising HTTP/1.1 but
> doesn't have the spec completely implemented?

The main feature missing is forwarding of 1xx responses.

Regards
Henrik