Re: [squid-users] Urgent Help Needed :Two Squid Servers performance issue when working with NAT

From: Arkin Y <arkin.yang_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:24:41 +0800

Adam ,

Thanks a lot for your response .
I used sniffer tool to catch the packet in both Poly graph Server
(10.56.233.99) and Squid server side (198.18.24.3).

I could see 198.18.24.3 send out SYNs, they SYNs were also could be
captured in PolyServer(10.56.233.99) side , but no ack were genenated
by the 10.56.233.99 server .

But if no NAT or we only run single squid , no such scenario will orrured ..

Do you or any other guys know how to check the RedHat Linux OS TCP
related log ?
I really have no idea on this problem , so wanna check whether this is
the OS /TCP realated issu .

Thanks !!!
Nice weekend !

-Arkin

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Adam Carter <Adam.Carter_at_optus.com.au> wrote:
>
>> > part of netstat -na in squid2 output like following:
>> > tcp 0 1 198.18.24.3:46304 10.56.233.99:9999
>> > SYN_SENT
>
> This shows that 198.18.24.3 cant communication with 10.56.233.99, so assuming no firewalling, you have a routing problem (which could be a NAT problem). Run a sniffer on 10.56.233.99,
> - if you don't see the SYNs coming in, then 198.18.24.3 cant route to 10.56.233.99
> - if you see the SYNs come in and 10.56.233.99 reply with syn/ack, then you have a routing problem from 10.56.233.99 to 198.18.24.3.
>
> Remember you need to have 2 routes to get TCP working - one to the server and one to the client. If you NAT then you'll need route(s) for the NATed addresses as well.
>
>
Received on Fri Jul 25 2008 - 07:24:44 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 28 2008 - 12:00:04 MDT