> I tried it once with squid 2.6. It did not work. But I would really
> like it if that would actually work (i.e. grouping multiple peers
> together so one doesn't need to create the same cache_peer_access-rules
> for all peers).
Thx for all the replies.
So what would be the alternative method in my case (2 pools of 3 servers)?
Would this work?
acl u1 dstdomain u1.example.com
acl u2 dstdomain u2.example.com
cache_peer_access u1pool1 allow u1
cache_peer_access u1pool2 allow u1
cache_peer_access u1pool3 allow u1
cache_peer_access u1pool1 deny u2
cache_peer_access u1pool2 deny u2
cache_peer_access u1pool3 deny u2
cache_peer_access u2pool1 allow u2
cache_peer_access u2pool2 allow u2
cache_peer_access u2pool3 allow u2
cache_peer_access u2pool1 deny u1
cache_peer_access u2pool2 deny u1
cache_peer_access u2pool3 deny u1
Does it spread the requests or won't the first cache_peer_access always be chosen...?
Thx,
JD
Received on Tue Sep 02 2008 - 08:31:34 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Sep 02 2008 - 12:00:02 MDT