Re: [squid-users] Cache_dir more than 10GB

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:36 AM, Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote:
>> Is it true that there are problems with Cache_dir more than 10GB?
>
> No. I have larger caches here. Some others have caches in the TB range.
>
> Only "cache_dir coss" specifically are known to have maximum size issues
> due to the format design. And not handle large files.
>
> There are some related issues known;
>
> You might need Squid built with --enable-large-files to get a 64-bit
> build if you intend to pass entire DVDs through Squid.

So, if this options are ok in my binare is ok to handle large files?

>
> Squid-2 has issues with handling of very large individual files being
> somewhat slow.
>
>
>>
>> Many people talk about it, but I dont found any information in Squid
>> website. May be I didnt looking for right!
>>
>> So, it is true, will be a big problem, because with big hd, more than
>> 100GB, all to make cache. We will have problem with speed of write and
>> read in one HD.
>
> AUFS on Linux, or DiskD on *BSD should have no problem with that size.
> Just make sure there is enough RAM in use for a mem-cache and the file
> indexes.

Why AUFS on Linux and DiskD on *BSD? What is the diference in those
System Operations?

>
> Amos
>
>

-- 
Rafael Gomes
Consultor em TI
Embaixador Fedora
LPIC-1
(71) 8709-1289