Re: [squid-users] Cache_dir more than 10GB

From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar_at_fantomas.sk>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 09:04:26 +0200

On 07.10.08 20:34, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On tis, 2008-10-07 at 12:46 -0300, Rafael Gomes wrote:
> > So, it is very risky.
> >
> > User may get a old page after a crash and journal recovery.
>
> It's worse. The user may get a corruoted page with content mixed from
> various old files after a system crash an journal recovery.
>
> With the default data=ordered this is avoided entirely, but at the
> expense of somewhat higher memory pressure under high load and somewhat
> lower write performance.

Or you may get micromemory PCI card with battery-powered RAM, behaving as
disk (linux kernel config CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UMEM) and use that for (even data)
journalling :)

http://www.vmetro.com/category4147.html?subid=4123

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I wonder how much deeper the ocean would be without sponges. 
Received on Thu Oct 09 2008 - 07:04:35 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Oct 09 2008 - 12:00:02 MDT