Re: [squid-users] Defining BL's via acls

From: Henrik K <hege_at_hege.li>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:51:40 +0200

On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 11:49:57PM -0700, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >Depends on your chosen ACL type and the number of patterns.
> >Many regex may be slower than DG, many dstdomain or dst may improve
> >response time.
>
> It looks like the lists are far too large for any regex type acls but
> the acl <name> dstdomain "file" is causing me issues with the way the
> shalla lists are formatted, some urls are complete and some aren't and
> the incomplete sites do not have begin with a "." so they aren't matched,
> any way around this?
>
> I don't know why squidgaurd is broken in all three of my setups, maybe
> an issue with the rpmforge package? No one has a 1.4 rpm and I won't compile
> on these production systems :( Later this week, I will try to fire up a
> vm with CentOS and test it out.

When using dstdomain with a lot of entries (million), a squid "reload" might
take tens of seconds. During this time it will refuse clients, which is not
nice. I don't think this has been fixed yet in any branch?
Received on Wed Jan 07 2009 - 08:51:46 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jan 07 2009 - 12:00:02 MST