RE: [squid-users] OWA accelerator authentication weirdness

From: Alan Lehman <alehman_at_gbateam.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:37:43 -0600

> >> The order in which our auth_param lines are configured can alter the
> >> first authentication method tried. You will need to look at the
> >> debugging trace in cache.log to see which is generating which
> question
> >>
> >> Amos
> >
> > Only basic is enabled:
> > auth_param basic children 5
> > auth_param basic realm Squid proxy-caching web server
> > auth_param basic credentialsttl 2 hours
> >
> > Do I need to select a program for basic?
> >
> > found in cache.log:
> > 2009/01/08 14:38:19.713| CacheManager::registerAction: registering
> legacy basicauthenticator
> > 2009/01/08 14:38:19.713| CacheManager::findAction: looking for action
> basicauthenticator
> > 2009/01/08 14:38:19.713| CacheManager::registerAction: registered
> basicauthenticator
> > 2009/01/08 14:41:22.010| CacheManager::registerAction: registering
> legacy basicauthenticator
> > 2009/01/08 14:41:22.010| CacheManager::registerAction: registered
> basicauthenticator
> >
> > The OWA web server has both basic and "Windows Integrated
> Authentication" enabled. If I disable "windows integrated", OWA works
> fine, but I need activesync also, which does not work without "windows
> integrated" enabled.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alan
>
> Um, further on my other email.
> Try some of the settings to disable pass-thru on the specific ports
> and/or peer:
>
> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/ConnPin


My config pretty much follows the wiki example for OWA accelerator. Squid 3.1.0.3. I'm using the same port for OWA and Activesync. I just added connection-auth=off on https_port and removed all auth_param lines, and that took care of my problem.

Thanks!


Received on Sat Jan 10 2009 - 16:37:53 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jan 11 2009 - 12:00:03 MST