[squid-users] Optimal debug_options?

From: <david_at_davidwbrown.name>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 09:54:45 -0600 (CST)

Hello Amos, squid gurus and mortals, this is in part in reference to a message from lorenor. I don't want to top-post lorenor so that being said I would just like to say the absolute best way for a lot of folks to <debug> their squid-cache issues is to turn on the debug_options. The squid-cache debug_options default makes sense for beginning the use of squid-cache but sorely needs attention if the user plans to make productive use of the squid-cache. In light of the previous sentence I have come up with a so-called optimal debug_options list for my instance of squid. The term: optimal means to leave or reduce the debug_options categories that are not needed or have no interest for the target squid user. The chances of a universal optimal debug_options is not possible as this needs to change for each user's instance of squid. I have listed my debug_options below and I have a few questions for such a list:

1. What or how does tuning the debug_options affect squid reporting tools such as: SARG?
2. What or which sections have been left out?
3. Which sections have the wrong debug level? <some section>,1-9?
4. Why was section 24 skipped?

**************************************
debug_options 0,2 1,3 3,3 4,2 9,1 11,3 12,3 14,3 16,3 17,3 18,3 20,2 22,3 23,3 25,3 27,2 28,3 30,2 31,3 33,3 34,2 35,3 37,3 38,2 39,2 40,3 41,2 42,2 43,2 45,2 46,3 48,3 50,2 51,2 52,3 54,2 55,3 56,3 57,3 58,3 61,3 62,2 64,3 65,3 66,3 67,2 68,2 69,2 70,2 71,2 73,3 74,3 75,2 76,2 78,2 79,2 81,2 84,2 85,3 87,3 88,3 89,2 90,3 92,2 93,4
Received on Sun Feb 22 2009 - 15:54:51 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Feb 23 2009 - 12:00:01 MST