Re: [squid-users] Squid-tproxy patch for squid 3.0

From: Vivek <viveksnv_at_aol.in>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 07:16:25 -0400

Thanks Amos,

As per the benchmark result 2.7 perform better than 3.1. But Tproxy v2
patch for 2.7 is obsolete. So that i need Tproxy v4 patch for squid
2.7. If anybody have have ?..

--Vivek

-----Original Message-----

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>

To: Vivek <viveksnv_at_aol.in>

Cc: squid-users_at_squid-cache.org

Sent: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 2:23 pm

Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid-tproxy patch for squid 3.0

Vivek wrote:

> Thanks Amos, We want Tproxy v4 support ( 2.6.28 kernel support) for

> squid 2.7. If we could get squid-3.0-tproxy patch from any achieves
it

> would be very helpful for us to develop a patch for 2.7..

>

There no single patch just a large collection of incremental changes.

The 2.7 code base is also a lot different to the 3.x codebase in these

areas.

Whats missing from 3.1 that you need from 2.7? It would be a more

future-proof work if the port was along the developer roadmap.

Amos

--
Please be using
  Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE13
  Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.6
________________________________________________________________________
You are invited to Get a Free AOL Email ID. - http://webmail.aol.in
Received on Tue Apr 07 2009 - 11:14:40 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Apr 07 2009 - 12:00:02 MDT