Re: [squid-users] Scalability in serving large ammount of concurrent requests

From: Roy M. <setesting001_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 17:39:04 +0800

Hey,

On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Jeff Pang <pangj_at_arcor.de> wrote:
> We use Squid for reverse proxy for the popular webmail here, serving for
> static resources like images/css/JS etc. Totally 24 squid boxes, each has
> the concurrent connections more than 20,000. For small static objects, Squid
> has much higher performance than Apache.
>
> But as I once submitted a message on the list, Squid can't get high traffic
> passed through. I never saw Squid box has the traffic flow to reach
> 200Mbits/Sec. While in some cases lighttpd (epoll + multi-processes) can get
> much higher traffic than Squid.

So did you tried Apache/Lighty + mod_proxy ?
Received on Sat May 02 2009 - 09:39:11 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat May 02 2009 - 12:00:01 MDT