RE: [squid-users] Re: Hot Objects suddenly decrease

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 16:00:49 +1200 (NZST)

> Hi,
> I found the same problem in squid 2.6.21, too.
> I guess that the problem would be caused by max object size in memory.
> The parameter is likely not to work in some situation.
> In the next month, if I have some time, I'm going to trace it.
>
> If somebody already fixed the problem, please let me know please.

If fixed its very likely fixed in 2.7 or 3.1 and require an upgrade.
The weird negative counters issue your trace shows was fixed at some
point, but thats only cosmetic AFAIK.

Looking forward to anything you can find on this.
Amos

>
> THW
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juca!!! [mailto:yurass_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 2:52 AM
> To: squid-users_at_squid-cache.org
> Subject: [squid-users] Re: Hot Objects suddenly decrease
>
> Hi guys,
>
> could someone help me?
>
> I think its a bug!
>
> Tks
>
> Best Regards
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Juca!!! <yurass_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> could someone help me indentify this problem, i use
>> squid2.6-stable20, and suddenly my Hot Objetcs in Mem Cache
>> decreases , it was storing 160k objetcs, and suddenly it decreases for
>> 50k objetcs, I get theses info at mgr:
>>
>> Memory usage for squid via mallinfo():
>> Total space in arena: -1190304 KB
>> Ordinary blocks: -1382006 KB 674308 blks
>> Small blocks: 0 KB 0 blks
>> Holding blocks: 13932 KB 5 blks
>> Free Small blocks: 0 KB
>> Free Ordinary blocks: 191701 KB
>> Total in use: -1368074 KB 116%
>> Total free: 191701 KB -15%
>> Total size: -1176372 KB
>>
>> And i get theses msgs at log:
>>
>> 2009/05/19 20:46:30| squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Disk I/O
>> overloading
>> 2009/05/19 20:54:19| squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Disk I/O
>> overloading
>> 2009/05/19 20:54:19| squidaio_queue_request: Queue Length:
>> current=448, high=468, low=321, duration=20
>> 2009/05/19 20:54:19| ctx: exit level 0
>>
>> What could I do ? Is it a bug?
>>
>> Thanks any help
>>
>
>
Received on Tue May 26 2009 - 04:00:57 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue May 26 2009 - 12:00:01 MDT