On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Amos Jeffries<squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:22:25 +1000, Jamie Tufnell <diesql_at_googlemail.com>
>> We are talking files up-to-1GB in size here. Taking that into
>> consideration, would you still recommend this architecture?
>
> Yes, the architecture itself is sound.
OK cool. Thanks again for the responses.
I just have one more question relating to this architecture that I am
having trouble finding in the archives or on Google, possibly because
I don't know exactly what to search for...
If a client requests a large file and it's not in the cache, does
Squid have the ability to start delivering the file before it has
fully retrieved it from the origin?
J
Received on Thu Jul 16 2009 - 11:45:46 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jul 16 2009 - 12:00:03 MDT