Re: [squid-users] New Accel Reverse Proxy Cache is not caching everything... how to force?

> Hery Setiawan wrote:
>> are you not kidding with cache_mem 3008 MB, that's pretty big mem you
>> know since the suggested for max memory only 32MB. you don't want to
>> save the cache in memory, do you?

> it's on a machine that does absolutely nothing else. it ran for a few
> days with the defaults, load average 0, memory usage nothing, disk usage
> nothing, was serving files and handling traffic but hit rate around 18%.
> I felt kind of obscene running an expensive server like that, while
> appearing not to do much of anything - but maybe that's not the right
> way to see things. ?

On 31.07.09 21:13, Waitman Gobble wrote:
> i'm not sure that 3008 MB is a wise number, but I'll see how it runs.
> after about a day it's using 20% of RAM. running the entire cache in RAM
> would actually be better, a machine with 250GB of RAM would be supreme,
> and 4GB is puny in this day and age, I think. But that's what's running
> in my world at the moment.

I hope you know what are you doing by configuring that big cache_mem...
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/SquidMemory

> Removal policy: lru
> LRU reference age: 1.25 days

I recomment using heap removal policy, even if it's heap lru - it's still
faster than pure LRU

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Saving Private Ryan...
Private Ryan exists. Overwrite? (Y/N)