Re: [squid-users] New Accel Reverse Proxy Cache is not caching everything... how to force?

From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar_at_fantomas.sk>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:59:32 +0200

> mån 2009-08-17 klockan 10:28 +0200 skrev Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
>
> > Is there any problem with current scheme where they are cached by underlying
> > OS' cache?

On 17.08.09 23:36, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Yes, there is a big difference in latency and CPU usage for very hot
> objects, at least unless you use the ufs cache_dir type which on the
> other hand scales badly with I/O if you have stuff which is not in the
> OS cache..

so you expect it to be mostly usefull on ufs cache_dirs?

OK, let's see if it gives us any performance improvement(s).

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
LSD will make your ECS screen display 16.7 million colors
Received on Wed Aug 19 2009 - 06:59:36 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Aug 20 2009 - 12:00:03 MDT