Re: [squid-users] When is squid-2.7STABLE7 expected?

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 23:45:19 +0200

fre 2009-09-04 klockan 15:41 -0500 skrev Dave Dykstra:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 09:48:43PM +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> > tor 2009-09-03 klockan 09:46 -0500 skrev Dave Dykstra:
> > > When is the next squid-2.7 stable release expected? I am very eager
> > > for the fix in http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2451
> > > (regarding 304 Not Modified responses).
> >
> > When I find some spare or paid time to finish it up.
>
> Ok, and about how much needs to be done to finish it up?

It's about a day worth of work.

- Back-porting remaining relevant patches from Squid-2.HEAD
- Write release notes
- Prepare the release
- Final review of the changes since STABLE6
- Sign the release
- Update web & ftp areas with new release info
- Write announcement

> Also, do you have any reservations about using the current 2.7 HEAD in
> production? That is, do you consider there to be instabilities that
> have been introduced since STABLE6?

The current 2.7 tree should be fine for production. It's very unlikely
some badness has sneaked in there since STABLE6.

Or did you mean 2.HEAD? Should also work fine in theory, but has not
seen much testing and some of the changes is quite intrusive.

> It doesn't look very straight-
> forward for me to backport just this fix to STABLE6 because the calling
> parameters to httpReplyBodySize have changed since then.

You mean the method parameter change? It's the same, just a different
type.

Regards
Henrik
Received on Fri Sep 04 2009 - 21:45:26 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Sep 05 2009 - 12:00:02 MDT