Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.1 behaving differently from 2.7.x?

From: Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandt_at_charite.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:19:23 +0200

* Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandt_at_charite.de>:
> * Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar_at_fantomas.sk>:
>
> > so the problem was not "3.1 uses too many connections" but "2.7 drops
> > connections when it should not".
> > A bit funny ;)
>
> I made some more experiments and found out that the problem is between
> the Squid in front of dansguardian.
>
> client -> squid_in_front -> dansguardian -> squid_behind -> Internet
>
> I was able to replace the squid 2.7.x "behind" dansguardian with a
> 3.1.x version without negative impacts (except for frequent crashes).

I increased the maximum number of dansguardian processes and found
that squid3 would use 297 dansguardian processes, about 2.5 times the
number 2.7.x would keep busy. Dunno if that's a good or bad sign.

-- 
Ralf Hildebrandt
  Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
  Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  Campus Benjamin Franklin
  Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
  Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962
  ralf.hildebrandt@charite.de | http://www.charite.de
	    
Received on Tue Oct 20 2009 - 14:19:37 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Oct 20 2009 - 12:00:03 MDT