Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 + mrtg

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:27:18 +0100

tis 2009-11-03 klockan 17:25 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries:

> > MIB numbering should never change. Old numbers may cease to exists when
> > their data sources go away and new number appear as new info gets
> > published, but existing numbering should not change...
>
> Converting IPv4 address fields to IPv6+IPv4 shared trees...
>
> The client info table had cacheClientAddressType added as .1,
> cacheClientAddress shuffled to .2
> ... which bumped all cacheClient* from .N to .N+1
>
> The peering table had cachePeerIndex added as .1 and
> cacheClientAddressType added as .2
> ... which bumped all cachePeer* from .N to .N+2

Ugh.. that needs to be redone. The new field needs to be added after the
other ones.

It is not permissible to renumber existing MIB entries like this, or to
reuse a old MIB entry for other purpose.

I'll file a bug on that so it's not forgotten.

Regards
Henrik
Received on Mon Nov 09 2009 - 00:27:23 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Nov 09 2009 - 12:00:03 MST