RE: [squid-users] Re: ubuntu apt-get update 404

From: Michael Bowe <mbowe_at_pipeline.com.au>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:52:04 +1100

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Morgan [mailto:atcs.matthew_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, 14 November 2009 7:59 AM
> To: Squid Users
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Re: ubuntu apt-get update 404
>

> Apparently I only get the dropped .bz2 extensions when using squid
> transparently, which is how our network is set up. If I manually
> specify http_proxy on my workstation to point to squid directly, I
> don't
> have any problems with apt-get update. Has anyone ever heard of this?
> Here's my updated squid config (this is 3.0-STABLE20, btw).

I've been having perhaps related problems with Debian servers behind Squid
3.1.0.14 TPROXY

I am not getting 404's but am intermittently seeing "invalid reply header"
errors. eg :

Failed to fetch
http://backports.org/debian/dists/etch-backports/main/binary-amd64/Packages.
gz The HTTP server sent an invalid reply header

Err http://security.debian.org lenny/updates Release.gpg
  The HTTP server sent an invalid reply header [IP: 150.203.164.38 80]

W: Failed to fetch
http://security.debian.org/dists/lenny/updates/Release.gpg The HTTP server
sent an invalid reply header [IP: 150.203.164.38 80]

As you say, if I specify HTTP_PROXY= to go direct to the cache rather than
transparent then all works fine

Michael.
Received on Fri Nov 13 2009 - 22:52:06 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Nov 14 2009 - 12:00:02 MST