Re: [squid-users] Max throughput of CARP Proxy

From: Kinkie <gkinkie_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:56:16 +0100

On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Markus Meyer <markus.meyer_at_koeln.de> wrote:

> Nice one. I think I can get to testing it next week. But the numbers I
> get out of it must be handled with care. Since this is a pure test
> environment. It's like a "best-case" scenario which sadly never will
> happen in a production environment ;)

It's ok, and the fact will be highlighted when publishing the results.
It is however common practice of all commercial vendors to use
pure-lab-environment numbers when pitching their offers, and I find it
only fair that we match that with numbers of our own. Also, it'll be a
nice ego-boost for all the Squid community to be able to claim
impressive numbers - hell, your numbers are impressive already..

Notice: if you implement multi-instance squid, an added boost might
come from tying each instance to a specific CPU core (on Linux it's
done via the taskset command)

-- 
    /kinkie
Received on Thu Feb 04 2010 - 16:56:44 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Feb 05 2010 - 12:00:04 MST