On 2010-03-21 00:25, Amos Jeffries wrote:
<CUT>
> In that case ... that trace is clearly showing that A is storing its own
> object and B is storing another, the request for A in the middle
> replaces the original A object leaving the B one present. Then the
> followup B replaces the original B object leaving the A one present.
>
> Vary storing itself seems to be working, but something else is causing
> the variants to be replace on each of their requests. This smells more
> like a Cache-Control problem.
The probiem is now solved. One of the application server was wrongly
configured and was sending a diffrent Vary header. That is why Squid was
purging such objects.
Thank you for you help.
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
Received on Sun Mar 21 2010 - 21:50:44 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 22 2010 - 12:00:05 MDT