Re: [squid-users] Multicast

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:01:32 +0000

On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:46:44 -0500, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
<luis.daniel.lucio_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Le mercredi 7 avril 2010 22:59:59, Amos Jeffries a écrit :
>> On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:49:07 +0530, senthilkumaar2021
>>
>> <senthilkumaar2021_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > What is the use of multicast option in squid ?
>> >
>> > How to configure squid to multicast messages and receive multicast
>> > messages?
>> >
>> > In order to configure multicast whether any configuration is needed
in
>> > other than squid
>>
>> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/MultiCast
>>
>> Amos
>
> Amos, i have a doubt about this
>
> in my lan 192.168.1.0/24 we are planning to set up squids in
workstations
> so
> we are planning to use multicasting so if caches may be shared.
>
> as we don tknow what ips are connected or not
> it is possible to stay a line like this?
> cache_peer 192.168.1.0 sibling 3128 3130 ttl=5
>
> or how can we manage this without putting all each ip in all conffs

I have not dealt much with multicat myself. AFAIK, at present you can't.
But I can't see any real reasons why not.

The multicast reduces bandwidth for ICP requests going out, but once a
reply comes in it still needs to be linked to a sibling peer.

At this point some experimenting (or advice from Henrik maybe) is needed
to follow it further. The linking I think looks up an explicitly configured
peer based on the replying source IP. It may be useful to make the peer
dynamic if sufficient security protection can be added.

Amos
Received on Thu Jun 10 2010 - 00:01:36 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jun 10 2010 - 12:00:03 MDT