Re: [squid-users] c-icap vs Havp

From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar_at_fantomas.sk>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 08:39:07 +0200

On 24.06.10 10:05, senthilkumaar2021 wrote:
> In order to use Anti virus scanning with Squid proxy which one is
> suitable whether C-ICAP with ClamAV or HAVP with ClamAv.We are having
> request rate around 300-350 re/sec.Which one will handle more requests
> with ease?We have made some basic tests and it seems c-icap will handle
> more requests.

then it's apparently true. and I found that more feasdible than using any
kind of parent caches for squid

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool. 
Received on Thu Jun 24 2010 - 06:39:10 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jun 24 2010 - 12:00:03 MDT