[squid-users] Re: Kerberos / SASL for squid_ldap_group

>"Nick Cairncross" <Nick.Cairncross_at_condenast.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:99A993AA-7D9F-49A2-BF7B-4BD51B109861_at_condenast.co.uk...
>
>> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:32:51 +0200, Maxim Burgerhout <maxim_at_wzzrd.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Of course I just bumped into that little gem *after* I sent the
>>> previous message to this list...
>>>
>>> It has the downside of not being included in, or supported by
>>> downstream distro's though. The major upside of having Kerberos
>>> support in Squid's ldap_group helper would be the fact that downstream
>>> distro's (the Red Hats, Canonicals and Novells of this world) would be
>>> more likely to support it. But I just checked out the squidkerbldap
>>> project, and it seems to work ok. The fact it handles the Kerberos
>>> cache in memory is especially nice.
>>
>> ... yet. Markus submitted it for bundling and its just passed our
>> upstream
>> QA. It hit Squid-3.2 beta bundles under the name
>> ext_kerberos_ldap_group_acl as of a few days ago. Along with a lot of
>> Kerberos support in other auth-related areas of Squid and associated
>> tools.
>>
>> Amos
>
>Amos,
>
>Re: 3.2
>
>Does this means an NTLM and Kerberos authentication helper wrapped in
>one..? So no need for two helpers..?
>

No it does not mean that.

>Thanks
>
>The information contained in this e-mail is of a confidential nature and is
>intended only for the addressee. If you are not the intended addressee,
>any disclosure, copying or distribution by you is prohibited and may be
>unlawful. Disclosure to any party other than the addressee, whether
>inadvertent or otherwise, is not intended to waive privilege or
>confidentiality. Internet communications are not secure and therefore
>Conde Nast does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this
>message. Any views or opinions expressed are those of the author.
>
>The Conde Nast Publications Ltd (No. 226900), Vogue House, Hanover Square,
>London W1S 1JU
>

Markus
Received on Sat Sep 04 2010 - 08:53:56 MDT