Re: [squid-users] Re: Bandwidth split?

From: J Webster <webster_jack_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 17:11:46 +0100

Thanks.
I still have users connecting at around 1.91Mb and faster on the server so
the delay pools don;t seem to be working.
Only thing I can think of is that it's not registering the ncsa users?

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Chad Naugle" <Chad.Naugle_at_travimp.com>
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 4:36 PM
To: "J Webster" <webster_jack_at_hotmail.com>; <squid-users_at_squid-cache.org>
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Re: Bandwidth split?

> Yes sorry, at work. See Below. I am not 100% on fill-rate versus the
> other numbers, so I'll leave that up for someone else to reply. I would
> just tinker with the values until you get acceptable results until
> then.
>
> acl magic_words1 url_regex -i 192.168
> acl magic_words2 url_regex -i ftp .exe .mp3 .vqf .tar.gz .gz .rpm .zip
> .rar .avi .mpeg .mpe .mpg .qt .ram .rm .iso .raw .wav .mov
> acl restuser proxy_auth ncsa_users
>
> delay_pools 3
> delay_class 1 2
> delay_parameters 1 -1/-1 -1/-1
> delay_access 1 allow magic_words1
> delay_access 1 deny all
> delay_class 2 2
> delay_parameters 2 5000/150000 5000/120000
> delay_access 2 allow magic_words2
> delay_access 2 deny all
> delay_class 3 1
> # 256 Kbit/s fill rate, 1024 Kbit/s reserve
> delay_parameters 3 32000/128000
> delay_access 3 allow restuser
> delay_access 3 deny all
>
>
Received on Mon Nov 08 2010 - 16:12:36 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Nov 09 2010 - 12:00:02 MST