Re: [squid-users] multiple squid 3.1.10 instances - independent vs frontend/backend

On 08/01/11 15:36, pyh_at_mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
> Amos Jeffries writes:
>>>
>>> Either
>>> 1) - 4 separate squid instances, each with its own completely
>>> independent cache? (no cache hierarchy or something like that)
>>> or
>>> 2) - a configuration similar to [1] with frontend and backend instances?
>>> Does anybody have experiences with either of these two configurations?
>
> I'm just not sure, it is a popular configuration of squid with
> multi-instances for reverse proxy today? Thanks.

I can't really answer about popularity. It's used by networks which see
a benefit from the scaling it provides.

Amos

-- 
Please be using
   Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.10
   Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.4