Re: [squid-users] Slackware Bridge + Tproxy + 2.6.37 + squid 3.1.10

From: Agua Emagrece <aguaemagrece_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 12:25:43 -0200

Just tested with 2.6.35 and 2.6.34 and the same happens. Anybody here
with the same issue in these newer kernel versions?

Thanks!

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Agua Emagrece <aguaemagrece_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Both from ftp.kernel.org and using exactly the same .config file.
> I'll try to get the time to test 2.6.32 to 2.6.36.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:24:43 -0200, Agua Emagrece <aguaemagrece_at_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Hello, Amos, how are you?
>>>
>>> I just did a test downgrading my kernel to 2.6.30 (downloaded from
>>> ftp.kernel.org), using the same kernel .config of the 2.6.37 I was
>>> using, and all the same iptables/ebtables/sysctl configuration. TPROXY
>>> just began to work perfectly. If I switch again to 2.6.37, everything
>>> stops.
>>>
>>> Can this really be a problem with newer kernel versions? Are there any
>>> specific configurations for these newer versions?
>>>
>>> Anybody here is using squid TPROXY with newer kernels (2.6.36-2.6.37) ?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance for your reply and help!!
>>>
>>
>> There was some ebtables ICMP related breakage in 2.6.32 which got fixed
>> mid last year, I think that was fixed the .37 kernel though. Other than
>> that the only change was IPv6 TPROXY going into .37.
>>
>> Best bring this up with the netfilter mailing lists if you are sure its
>> only a kernel difference.
>>
>> BTW: was it a .37 kernel from ftp.kernel.org or a slackware patched one?
>>
>> Amos
>>
>>
>
Received on Wed Jan 26 2011 - 14:25:49 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jan 26 2011 - 12:00:03 MST