Re: [squid-users] performance drop moving from 3.0 to 3.1?

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:29:05 +1300

On 19/03/11 04:32, Alex Crow wrote:
>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Which directive of these should be just "cache" in 3.1?
>>
>> The one which used to be called "no_cache" back in Squid-2.2.
>>
>> Amos
>
> So
>
> cache deny all
>
> is the same as
>
> no_cache deny all?

Yes. They are identical, except that recently Squid will throw warnings
at you for using the obsolete name no_cache.

Amos

-- 
Please be using
   Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.11
   Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.5
Received on Fri Mar 18 2011 - 23:29:08 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Mar 19 2011 - 12:00:01 MDT