Re: [squid-users] Problems with transparancy and pf

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:47:08 +1300

On 30/03/11 00:20, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
>> I've now installed Freebsd 8.2-RELEASE on new hardware and I'm using my
>> config from the 7.2 machine.
>>
>> My problem is that squid is not working with transparency. The browser
>> traffic goes directly to the Internet.
>>
>
> If u r doing with PF, Can I have your pf rules?
>
> I am doing squid 2.7.9 tranparent with OpenBSd 4.8.
>
>
> These are my PF rules.
>
>
> # filter rules
> block in log
> pass out log
>
>
> pass in log on $int_if proto tcp from $lan_net to any port { 80 8080 } \
> rdr-to 127.0.0.1 port 3128
>
>
> in squid.conf file
>
> http_port 3128 transparent
>
>
> acl localnet src 10.0.0.0/8 # RFC1918 possible internal network
> acl localnet src 172.16.0.0/12 # RFC1918 possible internal network
> acl localnet src 192.168.0.0/16 # RFC1918 possible internal network
>
> http_access allow localnet
>

It's worth noting the whole intercept section underwent a code change to
make the NAT lookups run-time selected. At the time care was taken not
to change the lookup sequence, but even so mistakes were found. There
were also outstanding reports that some were badly broken before the
change (doing the lookups completely backward so "myip" ACL matched the
remote client).

  I have not had anyone report either "works" or "fails" for IPFW,
IPFILTER or PF on the 3.1.10 or later releases.

I believe the other modules work due to people using them successfully.

FWIW; in theory you should be able to build Squid
with them all enabled and whichever your system provides will be used.

Amos

-- 
Please be using
   Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.11
   Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.5
Received on Tue Mar 29 2011 - 11:47:13 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Mar 29 2011 - 12:00:02 MDT