Re: [squid-users] TOS from remote to squid(2 series)

From: jiluspo <jiluspo_at_smartbro.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 20:36:20 +0800

remote servers I mean http web servers TOS.
I already know about peers in fact current squid(as of 04/24/11) TOS are not
being marked peer(digest or icp) hit when local miss.
http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3202

AFAIK squid 2 series TOS always marked zero from remote servers.
according to source code initial tos=0;

there are some patches called preserve tos miss but kernel(linux) needs to
be patched.

does kernel really need to patch in order to pass the TOS value from kernel
to squid?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Hasanen AL-Bana" <hasanen_at_gmail.com>
To: "jiluspo" <jiluspo_at_smartbro.net>
Cc: "Squid Users" <squid-users_at_squid-cache.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2011 7:56 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] TOS from remote to squid(2 series)

> It depends on how squid is getting traffic from remote servers....if
> you are fetching requests from remote cache peer then it is possible
> to set the TOS headers depending on the parent/sibling reply.
> If you have a parent/sibling proxy configured in your local squid ,
> then you can set the parent_hit/sibling_hit to whatever TOS/DSCP mark
> you want...
>
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 11:26 AM, jiluspo <jiluspo_at_smartbro.net> wrote:
>> squid can set TOS but why squid cant get TOS value from remote server or
>> pass them on miss.
>>
>> patching kernel for geting the TOS value and pass to squid is the only
>> solution? or it was chosen for highest performance...
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Sat Apr 23 2011 - 12:37:41 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Apr 23 2011 - 12:00:04 MDT