Re: [squid-users] TOS from remote to squid(2 series)

Thanks I'll try patching kernel then.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Beverley" <andy_at_andybev.com>
To: "jiluspo" <jiluspo_at_smartbro.net>
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2011 10:54 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] TOS from remote to squid(2 series)

> On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 22:43 +0800, jiluspo wrote:
>
>> >
>> >> lastly, what about its performance degradation(req/sec and service
>> >> time)
>> >> if
>> >> we add this feature.
>> >
>> > Performance degradation should be minimal, although I haven't run any
>> > benchmarks.
>>
>> theoretically, which would run faster if we user mark and patched zph?
>>
>
> Patching for tos, as you won't have the overhead of converting a tos
> into a mark and back again. Also, I guess that getting a tos value
> requires less processor overhead than getting a mark.
>
> Andy
>
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.