Re: [squid-users] Mesh

From: igor rocha <igorlogos_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 20:30:30 -0300

hello,
no, this is not the problem, it was a typo, I checked in my file and
it are with -, ie to round-robin .
2011/5/2 Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>:
> On Mon, 2 May 2011 18:07:53 -0300, igor rocha wrote:
>>
>> See, I'm configuring my squid.conf intending it to run in mesh:
>>
>> cache_peer 192.168.15.200 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin
>> cache_peer 192.168.15.201 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin
>> cache_peer 192.168.15.202 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin
>> cache_peer 192.168.15.203 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin
>>
>> My scenario is that there are four nodes, a front-end and the other
>> nodes. As it is configured, when sent to the node IP , he accumulates
>> more bytes than the other three nodes. I wonder whether we can make an
>> ideal balancing ? If yes, how to do it?
>
> You are missing a "-" in the option name "round-robin". If Squid is ignoring
> them that would drop you back to the default first-available logics which
> acts like you describe.

hello,
no, this is not the problem, i erred in the hour of the copy, I
checked in my file and it are with -, ie to round-robin .
>
> Amos
>
>
Received on Mon May 02 2011 - 23:30:36 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 04 2011 - 12:00:02 MDT