Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1.x and right configuration parameters for tmpfs 8GB

   Hi,
   I use 64-bit machine, HP DL380 G7. I thought that it should be
better to use tmpfs (part of the memory). After reboot it is clean and
empty, squid creates directories again automaticaly.
   So you recommend use a few of disk capacity and set caching to memory only ?
   Thanks
   J.K.

Cituji Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar_at_fantomas.sk>:

> On 01.12.11 15:05, Josef Karliak wrote:
>> I wanna use tmpfs for squid cache, is 8GB enough or too big ? We've
>> about 3000 computers behind squid, for OS is 16GB sufficient,
>> that's why I used 8GB for squid tmpfs.
>
> what is the point of using tmpfs as squid cache? I think using only
> memory cache would be much more efficient (unless you are running
> 32-bit squid).
> --
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
> Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
> Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
>

-- 
Ma domena pouziva zabezpeceni a kontrolu SPF (www.openspf.org) a  
DomainKeys/DKIM (with ADSP) . Pokud mate problemy s dorucenim emailu,  
zacnete pouzivat metody overeni puvody emailu zminene vyse. Dekuji.
My domain use SPF (www.openspf.org) and DomainKeys/DKIM (with ADSP)  
policy and check. If you've problem with sending emails to me, start  
using email origin methods mentioned above. Thank you.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.