Re: [squid-users] maxconn bug ?

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:00:00 +1300

On 13.03.2012 21:38, FredB wrote:
>>
>> Duration and overlap of those connections matters. If they were all
>> serviced in less than 100ms and closed it is possible they all took
>> place one after another sequentially with no more than 1 open at a
>> time.
>>
>> maxconn allows up to 3 *simultaneous* connections. Opening three
>> then
>> closing one before opening a fourth is permitted. Only opening four
>> at
>> once is not permitted.
>
> I'm trying with maxconn 1 and 20 r/s without any deny, it's strange
> no ?

Bit suspicious yes.

Tried apachebench (ab) with concurrency level 10? or anything like that
which can guarantee multiple simultaneous connections for the test?

Amos
Received on Tue Mar 13 2012 - 10:00:04 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Mar 13 2012 - 12:00:09 MDT