Re[3]: [squid-users] Transparent proxy and ppp

From: zozo zozo <flam4_at_mail.ru>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:23:08 +0400

And also by replacing port 192.168.13.1:3128 with 3128
Now squid tells that it listens to 0.0.0.0:3128, which seems not very right, but it works

Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:22:25 +0400 от zozo zozo <flam4_at_mail.ru>:
> Resolved by allowing port 3128 in iptables for ppp0.
> For eth0 it for some reason wasn't required - allowing ESTABLISHED was enough
>
> Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:53:57 +1300 от Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>:
> > On 20.03.2012 15:30, zozo zozo wrote:
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > I've setup squid and it works if I forward network from eth0 to wlan0
> > > (ap mode)
> > > But if instead of ethernet I try to use ppp0 packets, squid doesn't
> > > forward stuff, and in access log entries were something like
> > > 0_ABORTED
> > > (don't have those logs at hand, will provide more info tomorrow)
> > > Ports that are not sent to squid work fine, ICMP and HTTPS are
> > > forwarded correctly.
> > >
> > > ppp0 is interface created by wvdial (I share 3G modem internet)
> > > syslog doesn't show anything interesting
> > >
> > > Is there anything special to know about ppp and squid?
> >
> > Just that squid does not interact with NIC directly.
> > Squid sends packets with a source IP address (set by either
> > tcp_outgoing_address or system-selected default IP). What happens to
> > those packets is up to the OS routing.
> >
> > Amos
> >
> >
Received on Fri Mar 23 2012 - 09:23:18 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Mar 23 2012 - 12:00:04 MDT