RE: [squid-users] Linux + TPROXY + Remote Squid

From: Thomas York <straterra_at_fuhell.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 09:27:45 -0400

The way you have it set up (the server running Squid also being a router)
works fine. I run in to problems when I try to separate them out.

rp filter is disabled for all interfaces on both the proxy and the router.

Here is my current network configuration for this test bed..

Firewall
------------
Fw (iptables router) has three network interfaces.
eth0 connects to the 'internet'.
eth0 has the IP of 10.1.17.158/24 with a default gateway of 10.1.17.254
eth0 is being NAT'ed to allow the Windows 7 client and proxy access to the
'internet'
eth1 connects to a Windows 7 client.
eth1 has the IP of 10.1.1.254/24.
eth5 connect to the proxy (proxy01)
eth5 has the IP of 10.0.1.254/24.

root_at_fw:~# ip route list table 100
default via 10.0.1.1 dev eth5
10.0.1.0/24 dev eth5 scope link

root_at_fw:~# iptables-save
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.13 on Thu May 31 09:23:53 2012
*raw
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [1866:289737]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [788:89384]
COMMIT
# Completed on Thu May 31 09:23:53 2012
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.13 on Thu May 31 09:23:53 2012
*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [26:3577]
:INPUT ACCEPT [23:3388]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [5:352]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [2:120]
-A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
COMMIT
# Completed on Thu May 31 09:23:53 2012
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.13 on Thu May 31 09:23:53 2012
*mangle
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [126:15633]
:INPUT ACCEPT [126:15633]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [67:8420]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [67:8420]
:DIVERT - [0:0]
-A PREROUTING -i eth2 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j DIVERT
-A DIVERT -j MARK --set-xmark 0x1/0xffffffff
-A DIVERT -j LOG --log-prefix "DIVERT :" --log-level 7
-A DIVERT -j ACCEPT
COMMIT
# Completed on Thu May 31 09:23:53 2012
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.13 on Thu May 31 09:23:53 2012
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [1313:186460]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [12:815]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [733:82296]
COMMIT
# Completed on Thu May 31 09:23:53 2012

root_at_fw:~# iptables --list -t mangle

Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
DIVERT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:http

Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination

Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination

Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination

Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination

Chain DIVERT (1 references)
target prot opt source destination
MARK all -- anywhere anywhere MARK set 0x1
LOG all -- anywhere anywhere LOG level
debug prefix "DIVERT :"
ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere

Windows 7 client
--------------
The client has one network interface with the IP address of 10.1.1.253/24
and a default gateway of 10.1.1.254

Proxy
-------------
Proxy01 (Squid proxy) has one network interface.
eth0 connects to the firewall.
eth0 has the IP of 10.0.1.1/24 and a default gateway of 10.0.1.254.

-----Original Message-----
From: Eliezer Croitoru [mailto:eliezer_at_ngtech.co.il]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 11:09 PM
To: squid-users_at_squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Linux + TPROXY + Remote Squid

i was curios about it because the last time i setup a tproxy on debian it
took me couple minutes.
i am using debian squeeze 6.0.5 with basic 2.6.32-5-amd64 kernel and squid
3.1.6 from debian repos and tproxy works fine for me!!
debian installed with squid3 ebtables bridge-utils .
(also tested with self built squid3.2.0.17 and squid3.1.19)

the main thing with tproxy is to allow the VM net card promiscuous mode and
on the router machine disable reverse path filter using:
sysctl -a |grep rp_filter
should all be with the value 0

i am still trying to understand what you are doing on each of the servers.

what are the networks and what are the machines and what every machine does?

what i got until now was:
W7|eth0[what ip?} -(some net)---> ethX[what ip?]--|debian_router|--[what
ip?]ethX--(some net)-->ethX[what ip?]--|squid_debian|ethX[what ip?]--->{{{
internet}}}

please fill my gap about ethX numbers and on any MASQUERADING that happens.

notice that if you are doing DNAT there is not point at all in TPROXY
because the client IP was lost already.

output of:
iptables-save
ip route list
#if you are using some routing tables then also ip rotue show table
table_number_or_name_here

the only problem i have seen is that if i have an established session from
the client and i reload the rules i get this squid error page:
##start
ERROR
The requested URL could not be retrieved

The following error was encountered while trying to retrieve the URL:
(null)://www.cnn.com/

     Invalid URL

Some aspect of the requested URL is incorrect.

Some possible problems are:

     Missing or incorrect access protocol (should be "http://" or similar)

     Missing hostname

     Illegal double-escape in the URL-Path

     Illegal character in hostname; underscores are not allowed.
Your cache administrator is webmaster.

Generated Thu, 31 May 2012 01:17:12 GMT by localhost (squid/3.1.6) ##end

i will check with the latest squid version.

i am using this script to load the iptables rules:

#start
#!/bin/sh -x
##!/bin/sh -x
#load modules requierd for the tproxy
modprobe ip_tables
modprobe nf_conntrack_ipv4
modprobe xt_tcpudp
modprobe nf_tproxy_core
modprobe xt_MARK
modprobe xt_TPROXY
modprobe xt_socket

sysctl net.netfilter.nf_conntrack_acct
sysctl net.netfilter.nf_conntrack_acct=1 ip route flush table 100 ip rule
del fwmark 1 lookup 100 ip rule add fwmark 1 lookup 100 ip -f inet route add
local 0.0.0.0/0 dev lo table 100

echo "flushing any exiting rules"
iptables -t mangle -F
iptables -t mangle -X DIVERT

echo "creating rules"
iptables -t mangle -N DIVERT
iptables -t mangle -A DIVERT -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t mangle -A
DIVERT -j ACCEPT iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m socket -j DIVERT
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 80 -j TPROXY --tproxy-mark
0x1/0x1 --on-port 3129 ##end

this one for ebtables:

#start
#!/bin/sh -x
CLIENT_IFACE="eth1"
INET_IFACE="eth0"

ebtables -t broute -F
ebtables -t broute -A BROUTING -i $CLIENT_IFACE -p ipv4 --ip-proto tcp
--ip-dport 80 -j redirect --redirect-target ACCEPT ebtables -t broute -A
BROUTING -i $INET_IFACE -p ipv4 --ip-proto tcp --ip-sport 80 -j redirect
--redirect-target ACCEPT

ebtables -t broute -A BROUTING -i eth1 -p ipv4 --ip-proto tcp --ip-dport
80 -j redirect --redirect-target DROP
ebtables -t broute -A BROUTING -i eth0 -p ipv4 --ip-proto tcp --ip-sport
80 -j redirect --redirect-target DROP

cd /proc/sys/net/bridge/

for i in *
  do
    echo 0 > $i
  done
unset i
#end

Eliezer

On 25/05/2012 17:35, Thomas York wrote:
> I have a lab environment set up using two Debian Wheezy servers
> (Squeeze doesn't have a new enough kernel or iptables to do TPROXY
> properly). One of the servers is a router and the other is a proxy
> server. There are several clients connected to the router to simulate
> a production routing environment. If I have both the TPROXY
> redirection and Squid on the same server, Squid handles the requests
> and everything works perfectly. However, this isn't how I want the
> proxy to be configured in our production environment. I've changed my
> iptables rules on the router to redirect all tagged 1 packets to the
> proxy server. This is working perfectly fine and I can see the data
> being routed to the proxy server using tcpdump on both the router and
> the proxy. However, Squid on the proxy server doesn't seem to 'see'
> the data being routed and doesn't do anything with it. I have
> "http_port 3129 tproxy" set on the proxy server. Is there anything special
I need to do using iptables on the proxy server?
>
> Both servers are running kernel 3.2.0-2-amd64 and iptables 1.4.13 from
> Wheezy and the Squid being used on the proxy is 3.1.19. If any more
> information is needed, please just let me know and I'd be happy to
> supply it. Thanks.
>
> --Thomas York

--
Eliezer Croitoru
https://www1.ngtech.co.il
IT consulting for Nonprofit organizations eliezer <at> ngtech.co.il

Received on Thu May 31 2012 - 13:27:58 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu May 31 2012 - 12:00:05 MDT